ATSC 3.0 Under Fire: Can 5G Broadcasting Quench the Flames?

The rollout of ATSC 3.0 is facing significant backlash as critics like Tim Hanlon, Founder and CEO of The Vertere Group LLC, an Illinois based media-industry strategic advisory company, contend the technology is veering sharply from its initial public interest mission towards a commercialized, data-centric future. ATSC 3.0 was intended as an upgrade for television viewers but is now, according to Hanlon, being strategically redirected to serve enterprise clients, sparking accusations of abandoning core public service obligations.

At the heart of the controversy is a perceived pivot from the original promises made when ATSC 3.0 was first developed. The standard was promoted as a vehicle for delivering advancements including 4K Ultra HD video, interactive programming and robust emergency alerting systems -- all designed to enhance the public’s viewing experience. These consumer-centric benefits were the bedrock justifications for granting broadcasters continued access to valuable public airwaves.

However, recent developments within the industry, argues Hanlon, suggest a different priority has taken hold. The formation of industry ventures such as EdgeBeam, backed by major broadcast groups like Sinclair, Nexstar, Gray Media, and E.W. Scripps further underscore this strategic pivot towards enterprise data services -- with the intent to monetize broadcast spectrum through data delivery services -- seemingly sidelining the consumer television enhancements that were initially the standard’s primary selling points.

This strategic reorientation is drawing sharp criticism, with public interest groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation raising alarms that broadcasters are increasingly treating public spectrum as if it were a private data network. Concerns are mounting that this direction could lead to the encryption of desirable content and a greater focus on enterprise revenue streams, potentially at the expense of broadcasters' foundational commitment to provide local communities with essential news, emergency information, and diverse programming.

Meanwhile, advocates of 5G Broadcasting -- like Frank Copsidas, President of the LPTV Broadcaster's Association -- remain unwavering in their message that 5G Broadcast is already optimized for direct-to-mobile content delivery and public safety applications seeing it as having a potentially complementary role to ATSC 3.0. Further, Europe is pushing ahead as groups like BNE and 5BSTF form the roadmap to adoption of the 5G Broadcast standard, including commercialization, emergency response and public broadcast.

While ATSC 3.0 faces criticism for shifting towards commercial interests, 5G Broadcast is gaining global momentum as a public-centric, direct-to-mobile solution. Advocates like Frank Copsidas and European initiatives emphasize its role in both content delivery and vital public safety applications. In the US, this positions 5G Broadcast not as a competitor, but as a complementary force, working hand-in-hand with existing broadcast technologies to ensure essential information reaches everyone, everywhere, on any device for a more robust and responsive public communication infrastructure.

To keep up to date on the future of 5G Broadcasting, sigh up for our newsletter here: 5gbc.tv/newsletter

Tim Hanlon's article "From Public Trustee To Private Courier: The Curious Pivot Of ATSC 3.0" can be found here